Platform tokens often incorporate a "token burning" mechanism as part of their deflationary economics. Some might instinctively react with skepticism: "If they're going to burn tokens, why issue so many in the first place?" or "This is just another exchange marketing tactic." This article explores the design philosophy behind platform token burns and their fundamental purpose.
Is Token Burning Just a Marketing Strategy?
Investors in platform tokens are familiar with the term "Token Burning"—the process where cryptocurrency exchanges destroy tokens to reduce market supply, thereby theoretically increasing the token's long-term value.
Many wonder: "Why issue excess tokens only to burn them later?"
There are multiple interpretations of token burning. From a marketing perspective, token burns—like Bitcoin halvings—create positive market narratives. Announcing burns while simultaneously boosting prices creates "rational" price surges that attract investors. For example, when OKEx burned 700 million team-held OKB tokens in February, the price surged over 30% that day.
However, supply and demand dynamics reveal that reducing supply alone isn't enough. Without sustained or increased demand for the token's utility, its value may not stabilize long-term. Burns primarily stimulate short-term speculative demand rather than long-term user demand.
👉 Learn how top exchanges leverage token burns strategically
Token Burns as Investor Commitment
From an exchange's long-term growth perspective, token burns represent sound operational strategy. Many tokens issued during the 2017-2018 ICO boom were sold to fund operations.
Investors seek returns, but if an exchange's success doesn't translate to token value, the investment loses meaning. However, directly tying tokens to equity or profits risks regulatory classification as securities—inviting legal battles.
Thus, periodic burns proportional to exchange revenue became the ideal middle ground: rewarding investors while avoiding regulatory pitfalls. Simultaneously, investors motivated by higher returns help grow the exchange—a win-win.
Issuing too few tokens initially would hinder fundraising and deter investor participation.
Does Burning Circulating vs. Reserved Tokens Matter?
Execution methods for token burns remain debated. In 2019, Binance announced it would burn team-held BNB (80 million locked over four years) instead of market buys—sparking criticism that this allowed "cashing out."
Huobi's founder argued burning reserved tokens lacked market impact since they weren't circulating. However, Binance's approach also eliminated potential "internal sell pressure"—if team tokens eventually hit the market, circulating supply wouldn't truly decrease.
Long-term, burning reserved vs. circulating tokens shows little difference. Yet after Binance's 2019 policy shift, BNB underperformed rivals OKB and HT, suggesting short-term market psychology plays a role.
By contrast, OKEx and Huobi executed "absolute deflation" in 2020—burning both market-bought and team-held tokens (71.93% of OKB and 38.6% of HT). This dual approach maintained "external buy pressure" while eliminating "internal sell pressure," creating potent short-to-mid-term price catalysts.
Binding Platform Value to Tokens via Burns
Since exchanges can't legally distribute dividends, burns provide critical value accrual—directly linking exchange success to token value. Many valuation models (like Token Insight's reports) rely on burn data.
Without burns or alternative value distribution—and lacking compelling utility (e.g., IEO participation, voting)—platform tokens risk becoming mere fundraising tools. Basic functions like fee discounts often fail to drive meaningful demand.
FAQ
Q: How does token burning increase value?
A: Burns reduce supply. If demand remains constant or grows, basic economics suggests prices should rise over time.
Q: Why don’t exchanges just issue fewer tokens initially?
A: Initial issuance funds operations and growth. Controlled burns create ongoing incentives for investors and users.
Q: Do burns guarantee price increases?
A: No. Burns must coincide with growing platform utility. Without demand, reduced supply alone has limited impact.
Q: Which exchanges burn tokens most effectively?
A: OKEx and Huobi’s "absolute deflation" (burning both circulating and reserved tokens) has shown stronger price impacts than Binance’s team-only burns.
👉 Discover how leading exchanges optimize token economics